[urecht] Urheber ist nicht festzustellen

Osamu WATANABE pasoco at themis.jura.niigata-u.ac.jp
Die Okt 10 10:56:20 CEST 2006


 Ich habe eine Frage.
Darf man ein Werk, dessen Urheber man nicht feststellen kann, in
Deutschland benutzen?
In einigen Staaten ist dafuer Zwangslizenz vorbereitet, wie z.B. in der
Artikel 67 des japanischen Urheberrechtsgesetzes(sieh unten). Kann man
bei so einem Fall in Deutschland irgendwie das Werk noch benutzen, oder
man darf ueberhaupt nicht? Ich danke Ihnen im voraus.

         Schoene Gruesse aus Fernost, pasoco?


http://www.cric.or.jp/cric_e/clj/clj.html
(Exploitation of works in the case where the copyright owner thereof is
unknown)
Article 67. (1) Where a work has been made public, or where it is clear
that it has been offered to or made available to the public for a
considerable period of time, the work may be exploited under the
authority of a compulsory license issued by the Commissioner of the
Agency for Cultural Affairs and upon depositing on behalf of the
copyright owner compensation the amount of which is fixed by the
Commissioner as corresponding to an ordinary rate of royalty, provided
that, after the due diligence, the copyright owner cannot be found for
the reason that he is unknown or for other reasons.
(2) Copies of the work reproduced in accordance with the provision of
the preceding paragraph shall bear an indication to the effect that the
reproduction of these copies has been licensed in accordance with the
provision of that paragraph and give the date when the license was issued.